Friday, September 25, 2009
Obama has just given a speech to the world on nuclear weapons and the United Nations Security Council on Thursday unanimously adopted a resolution from President Barack Obama strengthening international cooperation on nuclear non-proliferation and disarmament, and committing to collaborate toward a global community "without nuclear weapons.” Well that is all well and good. But I have a few questions on a related matter that seems to totally slip through the cracks.
Why has Israel declined to sign the NPT? Why does the world ignore this fact?
From Wikipedia:
….Israel is widely believed to possess weapons of mass destruction, and to be one of four nuclear-armed countries not recognized as a Nuclear Weapons State by the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty (NPT). The US Congress Office of Technology Assessment has recorded Israel as a country generally reported as having undeclared chemical warfare capabilities, and an offensive biological warfare program. Officially Israel neither confirms nor denies possessing nuclear weapons….
Now Israel is making noise that they may attack Iran unilaterally and Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu has called on the U.N to take action against them. If they do take action on their own you know who will be blamed. Not the Israelis, we will.
My opinion (and I am not alone) Israel is a rouge nation and we should stop financing their bad behavior at the tune of $114 billion not to mention $30 billion in military aid to them. If we hand the bully on the playground the stick he hits the others with, are we not as guilty as he is?
Addendum:
So here we are giving Iran alot of grief, understandably;y.. But what of India spurning Obama’s NPT call? So we have Israel, India and Pakistan all refusing to join the rest of the world. At least Iran and North Korea have joined the club even if they don't always play by the rules... But then some say neither do we.
Thursday, September 17, 2009
A little tongue in cheek for you spurred on by the crazy debates on the Boise Weekly Forum.
NuclearShadows Newswire Sept 17-- A group of Democratic operatives have come up with a novel idea to save money in the new healthcare reform battle. Euthanasia. But unlike the current fear that is sweeping across conservative
Current estimates show that 45% of Americans still believe Obama’s health care package contains taxpayer funding for the so called “death panels” despite the presidents assurance that it does not and the lack of any credible evidence… Most of those 45% identify themselves as conservative and/or Republican.
House bill HR666 is in the drafting at this moment but sponsors of the bill say it should be ready soon and enjoys wide support among Democrats. NuclearShadows Newswire has obtained a few advanced pages of the bill. Following are some of our findings.
The candidates for the procedure will first be screened by using a series of questions. Among them:
How old is the earth?
Is
Does human activity affect global warming and is global warming real?
How many people did Bill Clinton kill?
After answering the series of question the person will be scored and evaluated. All those with a score over 45% will be taken directly to secret government facilities for immediate processing and euthanasia. Since those chosen have been shown to undermine the security of the
Although some may find these provisions drastic, the sponsor of the bill believe once the American people understand the huge saving to the treasury in health care, education and other costs, they will gradually embrace the wisdom of the new policy.
Tuesday, September 15, 2009
Idaho Peace Coalition to show Rethink Afghanistan
Please ignore the elephant in the room. What happened to the change Obama promised? Another opportunity down the drain as the Obama administration argued late Monday that allowing terrorism detainees in Afghanistan to file lawsuits in U.S. courts challenging their detention would endanger the military mission in that country. Although the Pentagon is giving the roughly 600 detainees at Bagram Airfield ( the other GITMO) a new chance to challenge their detentions, the Obama administration stuck with Bush administration policy in a court filing Monday night that said the Bagram detainees' rights shouldn't extend as far as U.S. courtrooms. The Pentagon will actually assign a non-lawyer soldier to them to help them gather evidence in an attempt to prove that they’re not guilty of whatever they’re being accused of. The military will then decide if they want to let them go or not.
It good to see some talk going on about
And new polls show that support for the ongoing war in
The Idaho Peace Coalition soon will be having a public showing of the series Rethink Afghanistan. Come to the Hyde Park Street Fair this weekend and find the Idaho Peace Coalition and the Snake River Alliance combining efforts in the Idaho Chapter 17 of Veterans for Peace booth. There will printed information on this event.
Friday, September 11, 2009
Mini Rant 911
8 years ago we began our adventure into the "War on Terror". Please go to the website of the 911 Families for Peaceful Tomorrows and read their statement for today.
Now for other matters.
NATO Secretary-General Anders Fogh Rasmussen said he is concerned the public debate on Afghanistan “has started to go in the wrong direction” after the civilan airstrike deaths last week.
Airstrikes have dropped in half so maybe that is why four Marines died in eastern Afghanistan after their commanders reportedly rejected requests for artillery fire in a battle with insurgents.
Peaople are urging General McChrystal to explain the path forward for success in the new strategy in Afghanistan…
Even as people are found stealing our money in Afghanistan we are increasing the number of these private contractors to fight the war. What are they thinking?
Write to the Whitehouse and tell Obama to end this war.
Oh well….
Work for Peace